Federal agencies Statistics Fines/penalties OSHA Construction Infographics Video

OSHA’s Top 10 Most Cited Violations for 2016

2016 OSHA's Top 10 Most Cited Viloations

Sponsored by

Although the rankings for OSHA’s Top 10 most cited violations change little from year to year, the agency provides dozens of statistics. Glance too quickly at the numbers for fiscal year 2016, and you might experience a sense of information overload.

A simple approach is best, said Patrick Kapust, deputy director of OSHA’s Directorate of Enforcement Programs. He presented the agency’s Top 10 list of most frequently cited violations for the past fiscal year in October during the 2016 National Safety Council Congress & Expo in Anaheim, CA. “Take the list,” Kapust said, “and look at your own workplace off of that list. ‘These are the things OSHA is finding. Would they find these at my workplace?’ It’s a good place to start.”

As for OSHA’s Top 10 list, it starts with Fall Protection (1926.501) as the most cited violation for the sixth straight year. Hazard Communication (1910.1200) and Scaffolding (1926.451) complete the top three most-cited categories, all unchanged from FY 2015.

Rounding out the top five most cited violations are Respiratory Protection (1910.134) and Lockout/Tagout (1910.147).

OSHA issued a total of more than 35,000 citations in its Top 10 categories during fiscal 2016, which ended Sept. 30.

OSHA’s Top 10 for FY 2016 begins below.

Most-cited violations, fiscal year 2016

Data current as of Oct. 11, 2016

Top 10 "serious" violations, fiscal year 2016

A "serious" violation is defined by OSHA as "one in which there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result, and the employer knew or should have known of the hazard."


Top 10 "willful" violations, fiscal year 2016

OSHA defines a "willful" violation as one "committed with an intentional disregard of or plain indifference to the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act and requirements."


Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Tom Johnsen
November 29, 2016
On the TOP 10 SERIOUS VIOLATIONS chart, the code sections for Hazard Communication and Scaffolding are reversed.

Title

Ed
November 29, 2016
As a 36 year veteran Safety Professional, when I read through the list of 10 most citied violation and they all are the same year after year and the largest OSHA fines it get me thinking, are we are really making head way in protecting workers? I know we are however, we still read about the many employers that don't seem to care about their workers as much as they do the bottom line. Another thing that just does not make sense how can a business that kills two employees only receive a $900,000 OSHA fine while another business who receives 46 egregious is fined 3.2 million? One would think that killing a worker or two would bring a higher dollar amount that any type of violation. In my opinion all of the companies above with egregious violation should no longer be in business period! It's really sad that in this day and age that we still have companies turning a blind eye towards safety and protecting their employees from hazards in the name of profit. When if they paid attention to both they would increased their profits.

Title

Luis meza
December 2, 2016
Buenas tardes a OSHAS, quisiera incrementar mis conocimientos en seguridad y salud ocupacional...en la institución a las que ustedes pertenecen, quisiera que me orienten que debo hacer gracias... saludos.

Title

SURESH NAMA
December 4, 2016
Sir, In many cases, safety IS a priority. But following the norms is cumbersome. And results in excess time spent on the job. Imagine a worker at elevated height ,with a safety belt; adjusting the same after a few minutes of work as he changes his position constantly. OR a worker entering a confined space ,with safety belt, breathing apparatus and working with other tools in his hands.It IS possible, and NECESSARY, but results in MORE time and effort ; and many a times therefore by passed to speed up work. FINALLY its a case of SAFETY vs TIME and PRODUCTION STOPPAGE ( MONEY) ; hence SAFETY bis compromised.

Title

Rick Mulkey
December 6, 2016
Looked at the list of top ten and vendors who could solve that problem but did not see anyone from the immediate area. Must mean that only the big time advertisers can help? Also comment on the OSHA fine when there is a fatality....I have been in safety for 30 year plus and had more then one compliance officer tell me that the fine is for the violation of the OSHA Standard and not the fatality. The family can take the information, violation and fine to an attorney for a civil case and sue for damage, violations and wrongdoing. I believe that is how the system works. How would OSHA know what that life meant to the family or anyone else regarding earning potential, etc, etc. Just saying.

Title

Rob
December 12, 2016
Sounds like you're making the case that government regulation is ineffective and unable to produce intended results despite their enormous costs to all of us. How is that possible?

Title

Ron
January 3, 2017
Ed, I hear what your saying about the $$ amount of fines, and yes it would seem a death should bring a higher fine. That said, maybe it's your example that's off. A One - to - One comparison would show the average of those 46 fines is $69,565.00 ea. The two deaths would have been $400,000.00 ea. And are they being fined for the DEATH or the Action that caused the Death? It should be the 2nd of the two, the Action, if I'm not mistaken. That in mind, how many of the 46 you referenced were actions that "could" have caused a death in the worst case scenario? As for having the same violations in the top 10 year after year, I dug just a little bit for a different perspective on that. Before I list numbers, consider this....it's always got to be SOMETHING. They would make a 95% reduction in every area, and they're would still be 10 of Something, so it being 10 of the most often used areas can't really be a surprise. Commercial Diving, as dangerous as it is, just isn't done nearly as much as Scaffold use, so we'll never see it in the top 10. Now back to the numbers. 2014 2015 2016 Fall Prot 7516 7402 6906 HazCom 6148 5681 5665 Scaffold 4968 4681* 3900 With the exception of the 2015 scaffold increasing slightly, all of them went down, then Scaffolding dropped a lot the next year. So, you are correct, we are making headway. (granted, I haven't looked at the other 7 yet). The Top 10 may swap back and forth, sometimes #11 and #12 jumping back up there, but hopefully we never see Commercial Diving in the Top 10, or even near it. And HOPEFULLY we continue on that downward trend in 2017.

Title

gabriel castillo
January 5, 2017
tienes que leer mucho , de que país eres...?

Title

Jerry Nolen
January 31, 2017
Safety Training

Title

Cameron
June 16, 2017
I was recently at walmart, and my car was hit by a mentally handicapped employee operating a cart machine. There are scrapes and dents with paint on my car. Is this a violation??