Federal agencies Construction Construction

Renewed OSHA alliance to focus on hazards ‘unique to female construction workers’

female construction worker
Photo: Missouri Department of Transportation

Washington — OSHA has renewed its alliance with the National Association of Women in Construction “to continue promoting safe and healthful working conditions for female construction workers.”

As part of the OSHA Alliance Program, the five-year pact will target hazards specific to women in construction, including selection of personal protective equipment, sanitation, and workplace intimidation and violence, a Dec. 15 OSHA press release states. The alliance began in 2013.

“Women represent a small, but growing, segment of the construction workforce,” Loren Sweatt, OSHA’s acting assistant secretary of labor, said in the release. “OSHA’s renewed alliance with NAWIC will continue to promote innovative solutions to safety and health hazards unique to female construction workers.”

According OSHA’s website, the alliance intends to collaborate on raising awareness of OSHA's rulemaking and enforcement tactics by:

  • Sharing information on OSHA’s National Emphasis Programs, Regulatory Agenda, and opportunities to participate in the rulemaking process
  • Sharing information on occupational safety and health laws, standards and guidance resources, including the rights and responsibilities of workers and employers
  • Convening or participating in forums, roundtable discussions or stakeholder meetings on construction to create innovative workplace solutions or to give input on safety and health issues

To spread their message of recognition and prevention of workplace hazards specific to women, the organizations will use print and electronic media, as well as OSHA and NAWIC websites; and speak, exhibit or appear at OSHA and NAWIC events. The agreement also calls for encouraging NAWIC chapters to foster relationships with federal OSHA regional and area offices, as well as State Plans and OSHA’s On-Site Consultation Program, to address construction health and safety issues.

NAWIC was formed in 1955 and provides educational and professional development opportunities to more than 4,000 women, the organization's website states.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Name
January 12, 2018
Unfortunately this type of thinking on serves to further publicize women to be viewed as the weaker sex. My safety vest/glasses/hardhat should not be any different than my male counterpart. Why should my sanitation processes be any different than a man's? Do not some men also experience workplace harassment and violence? Of course they do. Treat us as equals, pay us as equals. If I as a woman have the same earned position, the same experience & intelligence, then I should have the same pay grade and same workplace conditions as a man. This "alliance" and focus of segregating women out is demeaning and will not "promote safe and healthful working conditions for female construction workers." Missed the mark here on this one.

Title

Name
January 17, 2018
Replying to the previous comment dated January 12, 2018: The issue isn’t that women want different safety standards, it is that the safety equipment doesn’t always fit us. So yes, we should be treated equally, and that means having equal access to safety gear that fits properly. And women do have that monthly thing to deal with, or may need to pump breast milk, and often there is no where to do take care of those things properly or easily on construction sites. I recently saw a picture of a woman in a nasty porta potty pumping breastmilk, because she had no other option. I am short and found it difficult to source a properly fitting safety harness for rooftop work. I have had to pay extra for the “woman’s” gloves that fit.

Title

Chris
January 24, 2018
There is a difference in recognizing differences in gender and viewing one as weaker. I wear smaller gloves and PPE, though I am biologically male. Same working conditions are also not gender specific. If a man needs a health area for diabetic needs, it could be the same area for a woman's breast milk pumping station.

Title

Scot
January 24, 2018
I am doing my senior research project on the hazards specific to women in construction and this safety issue is interesting. I see the two arguments below as a way to better understand the situations women see while in the field. One believes that everything should be equal and not to treat women any differently than their male counterpart, yet when it comes to safety harnesses there is a huge difference. I am a tall man and my harness is a size large. My shirt size is double to triple X. I can see how being a smaller person would have a difficult time fitting into a harness and having it fit correctly. I wonder if we did treat women equally if that would be safe? We all agree that pay and benefits have to be equal as well as the same number of hours given to. Thanks Scot