Federal agencies Fines/penalties

OSHA settlement policy puts workers at risk, report claims

U.S. budget

Photo: SANSA Images/Thinkstock

Washington – The “deterrent effect” of OSHA fines takes a hit when the agency reduces penalties in cases involving willful violations and worker deaths – and OSHA too often agrees to reduce fines in exchange for an employer’s promise to quickly abate hazards, according to a report released June 30 by the Center for Progressive Reform.

OSHA’s Discount on Danger: OSHA Should Revise Its Informal Settlement Policies to Maximize the Deterrent Value of Citations states that during the past eight years, OSHA has issued final penalties at a median of 25 percent lower than its initial proposed penalties in fatality cases. The median penalty in such cases was $5,800, which report authors claim is “less than the cost of an average funeral.” The report also notes that penalty reductions were common in the poultry processing industry, which saw OSHA lower fines by a median of 40 percent from 2008 to 2016.

The report offered three recommendations for OSHA to improve worker safety and employer accountability:

  • Create national guidelines to discourage OSHA area offices from “informally” settling some cases.
  • Instead of requiring employers to abate only the hazards that caused a specific health or safety violation, pursue enhanced settlement terms such as formal injury and illness prevention plans, third-party audits of existing hazards and practices, and companywide hazard abatement.
  • Explore new ways to engage workers and their representatives in the settlement process.

“Federal law required an act of Congress to increase the amount OSHA is allowed to fine companies that put their workers in danger,” Thomas McGarity, member scholar at CPR and a contributing author of the report, said in a press release. “But the agency doesn’t need congressional legislation to fix the way it settles citations with scofflaw employers or to maximize the deterrent effect of the fines it gives to companies that break the law.”

On June 30, OSHA announced two interim final rules that will allow the agency to increase civil penalties for safety and health violations.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Mike Strabley
July 8, 2016
The reduction of a fine is a result of conversations between an employer and OSHA. The dialogue between OSHA and the employer enables both parties to be involved in correcting a situation. Without the negotiation process a price would be established for non-compliance without addressing the root cause. A check is going to be cut no matter what. A lesser check based on the cooperation of the employer with the OSHA inspector encourages an employer to seek remedies. Without the dialogue OSHA would essentially be establishing a bounty and setting a price for non-compliance.

Title

John Hoque
July 11, 2016
Reduced fines will save jobs. A single fine could destroy a small business. A win-win involves eliminating the hazard AND saving the business. A Pyrrhic victory helps nobody if hazard is eliminated and the job goes away.

Title

Dave Madaras
July 19, 2016
Many times the fine reduction goes toward training or improving other aspects of worker safety. The ultimate goal is to achieve a safe work environment. Yes some folks need a stick but it's not always the answer. Workplace safety has improved dramatically over the years it takes hard work and some creative thinking as well as technical expertise to build a successful safety culture. A national one size fits all bull whip is a very limited tool.