Workplace Solutions Facility safety Fall protection

Protecting ladder openings

Are chains allowed to protect a ladder opening instead of a gate?

Kee Safety
Photo: Kee Safety Inc.

Responding is Daniel Huntington, North American training manager, Kee Safety Inc., Buffalo, NY.

Answer: The simple answer is no.

You cannot use a chain to protect a ladder because a chain can’t close itself. I have walked through numerous facilities with chains dangling lifeless to the side of an opening as workers pass through, unaware of the hazards to which they are exposed. The most dangerous hazard regarding a chain instead of a gate is that it depends on someone else to put the chain back.

Let’s walk through the procedure of reattaching the chain while going down the ladder. The worker is required to stand on the ladder and use one hand to reattach the chain, all the while his or her back is to the hazard. Instead of placing people in this precarious position, a self-closing gate always protects the individual. It does this by eliminating the chance of user error and always protecting the opening.

Surprisingly, a great deal of confusion and misinformation surrounds the need for gates around ladders. The trouble stems from a letter of interpretation issued by OSHA in 1982. In this letter, OSHA stated that chains can be used in lieu of a gate given that the chain provides protection “at least as effective as” a swinging gate. As a result, many manufacturers of building equipment that require gates (such as overhead cranes, above ground tanks, etc.) started providing chains to save on costs. Over time, people became accustomed to seeing chains instead of gates. However, per the Federal Register, when discussing OSHA's new rule (November 2016) on walking-working surfaces and fall protection, OSHA states, “OSHA believes that double chains do not fully protect workers from falls at hole entrances, and therefore, is adopting the existing and proposed requirements that entrances to ladderway floor and platform holes have a self-closing gate or be offset to prevent workers from falling.” Therefore, according to OSHA, a gate is required at the top of all ladders. Below is the new OSHA code reflecting this requirement:

1910.28(b)(3)(iv) – Each employee is protected from falling into a ladderway floor hole or ladderway platform hole by a guardrail system and toeboards erected on all exposed sides, except at the entrance to the hole, where a self-closing gate or an offset must be used.

Visualize the ladders at your facility. Do they have chains instead of gates? If so, they need to be changed. On the equipment that you purchase, is the manufacturer still providing chains? If so, request an OSHA-compliant product. If you require additional assistance or want to take the next step, please call a professional and have an assessment performed.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Pradeep Kumar Saini
May 31, 2018
Hi, i would like to know the chains specifications and load bearing capacity that are being used in the work platfrom of mobiile ladders. such chains are used for fall protection of the person who are working on the mobile ladders. Reagrds pradeep

Title

Greg Fullenkamp
June 25, 2018
What about the safety chains that are also present on many scissor lifts? Are they exempt because they (generally) have a rigid top rail and only a (mid rail) chain? Does the new standard / or a LOI address this?

Title

Steve Caudill
October 3, 2018
I concur with your article about the use of chains (where the employee must physicaly make the connection) and use of a self-closing gate that closing automatic once the employee enters the work platform. My question is related to the need/requirement for a self-closing safety gate on a B-1 Type Aircraft Stairway Maintenance Work Platform. This type stand is used as a fall protection measure when working at elevation on aircraft. Our organization recently purchased several B-1 stands (CLYDE, Model 15F900). Stand is manually powered with hydraulic lift to raise work platform up to 12-feet. The platform is 48" x 48", with direct access (not off-set) to the stairway. In the CLYDE Product Brochure, it states that it is OSHA Compliant and designed to ANSI A17.4-2006 code requirements. Did ANSI change the code in 2014 requiring this type of platform to have a self-closing gate? Any guidance or reference that you can provide is greatly appreciated.

Title

Name
October 25, 2018
Sounds good, but you're forgetting the pesky "or an offset " part of 1910.28(b)(3)(iv). In other words although a "self-closing gate" would be preferred, it is not required in all situations. OSHA is the absolute bottom of the barrel minimum when it comes to ensuring a safe work environment and if your company/organization only meets and not exceeds OSHA requirements, that makes you bottom of the barrel too.

Title

Scott
July 30, 2019
Reality vs academia...In an effort to comply with this regulation, the safety group at my organization installed a spring loaded gate at the entryway to a workstand. The gate isnt the problem - you also have to duck under a 4 ft cross bar, which never used to be a problem. Now, while disembarking from an upward climb, and ducking under a 4 ft crossbar, i have a spring loaded ladder pushing back on me. Its knocked me off balance multiple times, not to mention pinched fingers and minor bumps and bruises. This effort to prevent a previously non-existent fall hazard created a very REAL one. Trying to get them to remove or modify the darn thing is like pulling teeth, because they are convinced they have to abide by the letter of this law, despite how unsafe the new configuration actually is. We're missing the forest for the trees...