Recordkeeping Construction

House resolution would block OSHA’s ‘ongoing obligation’ recordkeeping rule

Anti-retaliation
Photo: Ridofranz/iStockphoto

Washington – A resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act seeks to overturn a final rule from OSHA clarifying employers’ “ongoing obligation” to make and maintain accurate records of work-related injury and illness data.

On Feb. 21, Rep. Bradley Byrne (R-AL) introduced a resolution to block the so-called “Volks” rule from taking effect and prevent future administrations from promulgating a similar rule. Byrne, who is the chairman of the Subcommittee on Workforce Protections, said the final rule – published Dec. 19 – failed to improve safety for workers.

The Occupational Safety and Health Act states that employers must record and maintain work-related injury and illness data over a five-year span, but employers may be cited for violations only within a six-month time period. OSHA rewrote the “Volks” rule, which is named after a legal case involving Volks Constructors, to increase the possible penalty threshold for up to five years, a press release states.

“Every worker deserves safe and healthy working conditions, and bad actors who put hardworking men and women in harm’s way must be held accountable,” Byrne said in the release. “That’s why Republicans have consistently called on OSHA to improve its enforcement efforts and collaborate with employers to address gaps in safety.

“Unfortunately, the Obama administration consistently doubled down on failed, punitive policies that do more to tie small businesses in red tape than protect workers. With this rule, OSHA rewrote federal law while doing nothing to improve worker health and safety. Congress must reject this unlawful power grab and encourage the agency to adopt the responsible, proactive safety approach that America’s workers deserve.”

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Renea Nordquist
February 24, 2017
It would be great to see a shift in helping workers and employers maintain a safe environment without adding undue hardships and paperwork. We need to get back to the common sense approach. Our biggest fear should be the upcoming workers that have been sheltered and have no ability to see hazards and dangers because they have never had to look out for themselves. Everyone has a goal of going home safe every night, we just need to remind them that to do that they need to keep safety on the brain.

Title

Name
February 24, 2017
I'mean sorry, I'm confused. Is Rep. Byrne'so action strengthening or weakening the reporting requirements and penalties?

Title

Matt
February 24, 2017
OSHA is all about money. Especially now more than ever because without government funding they have to generate income somehow. They couldn't care less about the employee or employer. It's all OSHA getting paid, they say they want employers to be safer but, will NOT work with you from a corrective actions standpoint. If OSHA truly wanted to help employers become "safer" employers instead of fining employers, work with them to correct violations and citations. This is my first hand experience in dealing with OSHA at my workplace.

Title

Stephen Leonard
February 25, 2017
Punitive legislation is the only deterrent the employers understand. If there is in no repercussion for violations, then workers are simply on their own.