Workplace Solutions Personal protective equipment Protective clothing

Comfort innovations lead to greater FR clothing compliance

How is the comfort of FR clothing related to compliance?

Workrite.jpg

Responding is Mark Saner, FR technical manager, Workrite Uniform Co., Oxnard, CA.

Simply owning a treadmill doesn’t make you fit. And simply owning flame-resistant clothing doesn’t protect you from thermal hazards. In order to reap the full safety benefits, workers need to actually wear their FR garments – and they need to wear them consistently and correctly.

The use of FR clothing is mandated in a variety of workplaces by multiple OSHA standards, including 1910.132, 1910.269 and 1910.335. Several other industry standards, such as NFPA 2112 and NFPA 70E, provide additional guidelines regarding FR clothing requirements. If employees do not wear their FR clothing in compliance with these standards, they not only increase their chance of injury from heat- and fire-related hazards, but also put their workplaces at risk of incurring fines.

Just as discomfort is a major factor in opting to stay off the treadmill, it is also a major factor in employees choosing not to wear their FR clothing compliantly. In an attempt to cool off on a hot day, workers may push up their sleeves, leaving areas of the skin exposed. Or, in an effort to escape the restricting feel of stiff fabrics or clothing designed with poor mobility, wearers may untuck or unbutton their shirts, increasing the likelihood of their garments getting caught on something and of exposing the skin to hazards. Worst of all, if FR clothing is too uncomfortable, employees may decide not to wear it at all.

Fortunately, FR clothing manufacturers have made significant improvements in comfort over the years. One of the more recent innovations is improved FR denim, which offers a casual, relaxed alternative to classic FR work pants, in styles workers will want to wear both on and off the job.

Another recent innovation is FR clothing designed specifically for women, such as pants with a lower rise and tailored shirts. By providing a better fit, these styles help increase wearer compliance.

A variety of compliance-inspiring options are now available – if you know what to look for. In general, it is best to select FR garments made from flexible, lightweight fabrics with excellent breathability and moisture management. Additionally, it is important to identify styles that will provide the best possible fit for each individual employee and seek options that support job performance by offering greater mobility.

Of course, comfort is largely subjective and preferences may vary between individual workers and/or work environments. To help identify the best fit for your needs, consider doing wear trials to experiment with various fabric and style options.

Compliance matters when it comes to safety, and selecting comfortable FR clothing can go a long way toward encouraging employees to get up on that metaphorical treadmill and wear their protective apparel properly.

Editor's note: This article represents the independent views of the author and should not be construed as a National Safety Council endorsement.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Name
March 28, 2017
Your 4th sentence of this article is incorrect. You stated: "The use of FR clothing is mandated in a variety of workplaces by multiple OSHA standards, including 1910.132, 1910.269 and 1910.335." No where in any OSHA regulation is the use of FR clothing mandated. Workplace Hazard Assessments are required. The assessment with determine the need for PPE. Please refrain from making misleading statements.

Title

Mark Saner
March 30, 2017
In reply to the comment, I wouldn't characterize stating OSHA rules require FR clothing as misleading. For example, as a result of OSHA required workplace hazard assessments, if certain hazards are present, like flash fire or electric arc flash, the use of FR clothing is deemed necessary as a means of fulfilling the following OSHA standards. OSHA 1910.132 requires employers to assess the workplace for hazards and ensure each affected employee wears the appropriate PPE which can definitely mean FR clothing. As an example of an OSHA FR clothing requirement relative to 1910.132, in an OSHA memorandum related to oil and gas drilling operation, it states the following: "CSHOs shall cite 29 CFR 1910.132(h) when an employer fails to provide, at no cost to employees, FRC that is used to comply with the standard. OSHA has concluded that employers are required to provide and ensure the use of FRC during certain operations" (CSHO stands for Certified Safety and Health Official – FRC is FR Clothing) CSHOs shall cite 29 CFR 1910.132(e) when defective or damaged FRC is used. In the case of 1910.269, the standard does specifically call out for the use of FR clothing, see below. 1910.269(l)(8)(iv) The employer shall ensure that the outer layer of clothing worn by an employee, except for clothing not required to be arc rated under paragraphs (l)(8)(v)(A) through (l)(8)(v)(E) of this section, is flame resistant under any of the following conditions: 1910.269(l)(8)(iv)(A) The employee is exposed to contact with energized circuit parts operating at more than 600 volts, 1910.269(l)(8)(iv)(B) An electric arc could ignite flammable material in the work area that, in turn, could ignite the employee's clothing, In the case of OSHA 1910.335 it states employees working in areas where there are potential electrical hazards shall be provided with, and shall use, electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed. I don’t think it’s a stretch to conclude that OSHA can cite someone based on 1910.335, stating they shall wear electrical protective equipment appropriate for the specific part of the body, when the national consensus standard for electrical protective wearing apparel, ASTM F1506, requires arc-rated clothing, which is FR. Particularly in the case of 1910.269 OSHA it specifically states the clothing shall be flame resistant. Citing these types of specific examples in future articles may be helpful in clarifying where OSHA rules call for the use FR clothing apply\ies either directly or indirectly. I hope this clarifies why the OSHA reference was used.