Federal agencies

Will Harwood Grants get the ax? Acosta talks compliance assistance during DOL budget hearing

Secretary of Labor - A. Acosta
Photo: House Appropriations Committee

Washington – Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta on June 7 addressed the possible elimination of the Susan Harwood Training Grant Program while re-affirming the Department of Labor’s commitment to compliance assistance in his first appearance before with the House Appropriations Committee’s Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Subcommittee.

Speaking about the proposed budget for fiscal year 2018, Acosta said DOL’s plan is to provide direct training in place of awarding the Harwood Grants, which provide funding to nonprofit organizations for the creation of worker safety training and education. Cutting the program would save about $10.5 million, DOL stated in its initial request.

“We’re going to do more with less, and we have to do more with less,” Acosta said. “We’re going to focus the department on its core mission by making smart investments in programs that work. The budget makes hard choices, and they are hard, but they’re responsible choices that have to be made. Americans want good and safe jobs. The department is here to support Americans’ desire to gain and hold these jobs.”

In response, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), the subcommittee’s ranking member, said, “You cannot do more with less – you can only do less with less. In my view, that’s what this budget proposal will do: less for American workers.”

DOL faces a potential $2.4 billion cut for FY 2018, but is proposing to increase compliance assistance for its worker protection agencies by $16.6 million, including $4 million to hire specialists. Part of that $4 million will go to aid OSHA’s Voluntary Protection Programs, which Acosta called “particularly successful.”

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Lori Horan
June 16, 2017
I agree with Acosta. We can hand non-profit agencies all the money in the world to keep re-creating the safety wheel of videos, quizzes, powerpoints, etc., or we can direct the funds to be used assisting private companies with their compliance directly. Companies have plenty access to training materials/resources.

Title

Daniel J.
June 16, 2017
"In response, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), the subcommittee’s ranking member, said, “You cannot do more with less – you can only do less with less. In my view, that’s what this budget proposal will do: less for American workers.”" You don't cut a budget with business as usual, you don't balance a budget by not cutting a budget. As the subcommittee's ranking member maybe she should be taking an accounting or economics class to see how businesses successfully down size because they have to. Businesses and States have been cutting budgets when necessary for years, why can't the Federal Government figure this out. When will they realize money doesn't grow on trees and you can't print all you want. Try writing checks on an empty account, or print your own money and see how long it takes for a "government official" to come knocking on your door. Take a lesson from the American worker, when we only have a hundred dollars in our account, we only spend a hundred dollars, that's how we survive.

Title

Larry D.
June 16, 2017
We have to question what" bang for the buck" we get in return. I agree with both Lori and Daniel below. In this country we have been writing bad checks for years. Don't agree look at our current Nation Debt and the interest needed to halt the growth. What a legacy we are leaving for our children and grand children who will learn the hard way...."nothing is free"!

Title

Bob Harrell
June 19, 2017
Having reviewed a number of Susan B. Harwood Grant materials while seeking information that I can use in the classroom and in my consulting career, I have found that too many of the grants are just a regurgitation of the OSHA regulations, use of out of date safety standards or misapplication of safety rules & regulations. As a safety professional with with over 46 years of experience, I find most of the grant material to be useless as the programs do not improve safety or add value to training programs. The monies allocated to the Susan B. Harwood Grant program should be reassigned to efforts to improve safety & health, rather that the writing of grant materials that parrot the OSHA regulations as the OSHA regulations are out of date compare to the ANSI and ASME standards.