Federal agencies Regulation Unions

AFL-CIO decries ‘war on regulatory protections’

AFL-CIO

Silver Spring, MD – The AFL-CIO’s Executive Council has denounced efforts to roll back federal laws and regulations that “have protected working people on the job” for more than 50 years.

In a statement released July 27, the organization highlighted OSHA rules on beryllium, silica and injury/illness reporting that have been delayed or struck down during the Trump administration. The statement also makes reference to a Mine Safety and Health Administration rule on mine examination that has been delayed until Oct. 2.

“The Trump administration, along with the Republican leadership in Congress and their allies, have launched a war on regulation,” the statement reads. “These efforts have been advanced with bogus claims that regulations cost jobs and impede economic growth. There is no less than a concerted effort to roll back regulations and leave the public unprotected.”

AFL-CIO also objects to pending legislation – specifically the Regulatory Accountability Act. That bill, passed by the House on Jan. 11, aims to revise federal rulemaking procedures by requiring agencies to look at costs and impact of any new regulations, among other considerations.

“It would make cost, not protection of workers or the public, the primary consideration, overriding existing laws, including the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Mine Safety and Health Act, and transportation safety laws,” the AFL-CIO statement reads. “This bill would add dozens of new analytical and procedural requirements to the rulemaking process, adding years to the already lengthy process, and provide new opportunities for special interests and their lobbyists to block or weaken rules they oppose.”

In the first regulatory agenda released under President Donald Trump, OSHA cut 16 regulations or reclassified them as “long-term” or “inactive,” compared with 30 listed on the fall 2016 agenda. Overall, 469 regulations were cut and 391 were considered long-term/inactive to allow for further review.

“This agenda represents the beginning of fundamental regulatory reform and a reorientation toward reducing unnecessary regulatory burden on the American people,” the agenda’s preamble states.

President Trump signed an Executive Order on Jan. 30 that requires federal agencies to cut two existing regulations for every regulation proposed. The White House later clarified in a guidance memo that the Executive Order would apply only to regulations with estimated costs of $100 million or more.

In addition, President Trump on Feb. 24 signed an Executive Order that required each federal agency to review its existing regulations, and potentially repeal, replace or modify them.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

John Saunders
August 4, 2017
First and foremost I am an employee. I collect a paycheck every other week. The government has created so many rule-making entities, i.e. the EPA, EEOC, OSHA, AQMD, Workers Compensation, and each applies its footprint to the backs of business, so much so that it becomes more cost effective not to produce in America and the AFL/CIO knows this (Cengage Advantage: American Foreign Policy and Process). Each of these entities has its own employee base, legal base, court or hearing system, but each, in order to survive, must take a bite out of business. The AFL/CIO is no different an organization. Its survival is dependent on it taking a bite out of business and its biggest champion is the NLRB, but I would ask the AFL/CIO to provide one example of the NLRB suing labor as opposed to business? Fed OSHA uses the General Duty Clause to hold business accountable for breaking rules that do not exist. Also, Fed OSHA has offspring in what, half the states in the nation? Another level of rule-making authority all taking a bite out of business for their survival. Lets briefly talk about Workers Compensation. We are an interstate commerce and yet we have 52-different ways (including D.C. and Puerto Rico) to administer workers compensation in the U.S., each with its own attorneys, doctors, judges, insurances, and all existing by taking yet another bite out of business. How many times has the AFL/CIO used the workers compensation system as a means for protecting a union member employee? In the end, the pendulum always swings. The world is shrinking. With the advancement of transportation technology, production can be, and is done in countries thousands of miles from Americas shores and on the store shelves in America in 48-hours. If you want work back in America, you have to level the playing field. Of all the people to cry foul, it would be labor unions who's mantra is "A fair days work for a fair days pay". I would ask the AFL/CIO, with a 9-word mantra, how did labor agreements become mini novels?