Contractors Federal agencies Fines/penalties Construction

Appeals court rules contractors can be cited for hazardous conditions at multi-employer worksites

gavel
Photo: Michał Chodyra/iStockphoto

New Orleans — OSHA can issue citations to general contractors who fail to control hazardous conditions at multi-employer worksites, even if those conditions do not directly affect their own employees, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled Nov. 26.

In its decision, the court states that the landscape has changed since the 5th Circuit ruled in 1981 that “OSHA regulations protect only an employer’s own employees” in Melerine v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. Brian Duncan, administrative law judge for the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission’s Denver regional office, used that decision as precedent in April 2017 when he decided that Hensel Phelps Construction Co. could not be held liable for OSHA violations from one of its subcontractors. The Department of Labor appealed that decision.

The appeals court stated that because of the Chevron deference, which comes from the 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case Chevron USA, Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., that the 1981 5th Circuit decision no longer is valid. The 5th Circuit covers Louisiana, Texas and Mississippi.

In the Chevron decision, the Supreme Court ruled that courts should defer to an agency’s interpretations of its own statutes as long as that interpretation is reasonable and Congress has not addressed the particular issue clearly.

According to the 5th Circuit’s published decision, Phelps Construction’s subcontractor, Haynes Eaglin Watters, hired another company, CVI Development, for “demolition, excavation and other work” in 2014 at a library construction site in Austin, TX. A CVI excavation project did not have a protective system (e.g., sloping), and a “nearly vertical wall” of soil was stacked about 12 feet high.

When CVI attempted to have its employees work elsewhere on the construction site during a rainy morning in March 2015, a City of Austin inspector and a Phelps Construction area superintendent told CVI owner Karl Daniels that his workers had to go back to the excavation site.

Sign up for Safety+Health's free monthly email newsletters and get the news that's important to you. Subscribe now

On the same day, the OSHA area office in Austin received a complaint of hazardous working conditions. The inspector saw three CVI employees working “at the base of an unprotected wall of excavated soil” in full view of the city inspector, Phelps Construction superintendents and HEW personnel.

OSHA fined Phelps Construction $70,000 for one willful citation because it was the “controlling employer” under OSHA’s Multi-Employer Citation Policy, which went into effect in December 1999. “A controlling employer” is one that has “general supervisory authority” over a worksite, including the power to correct safety violations or compel others to correct them.

CVI was fined $18,000 for one serious and one willful violation.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Daniel Hughes, CSP
December 7, 2018
I think this is long overdue. Citing the facility or the controlling employer only is not only lacking in fairness but, it gives a carte blanch license to smaller contractors who will not be controlled. IMO.

Title

Andrew Boutin
December 8, 2018
I was an employee of a large regional contractor in Chittenden County Vermont. At a safety meeting my employer had a hired a safety specialist give a presentation to several of us employees. Along the same lines as your article here the safety specialist said a housing contractor (not sure where) had hired a retired 63 year old farmer to help build this house. The story went like this.. There was an extension ladder on site which wasn't climb worthy and the farmer noticed it and said nothing. A much younger man on the job site grabbed the ladder and was going to use it and the farmer noticed that the young man was about to use the ladder and again, said nothing. The young man used the ladder, the ladder failed and the young man became seriously injured and sued. He didn't sue the builder, he sued the farmer. The farmer said right after the accident "I knew the ladder was bad and should have done something about it". Presumably before he thought he might get sued. Well, the farmer thought since it wasn't his company building the house he had nothing to worry about. The farmer had to fight in court and subsequently lost. He lost his farm too which was his retirement. They got the farmer for " willful neglect" The story even gets worse but, we will leave it at that. I think the statement is true along different scenarios. ( If you see something, say something.)

Title

Name
February 26, 2019
I work for a drywall/metal stud commercial company. Accelerated schedules and unrealistic deadlines, to many times a GC will yell and scream to do what ever it takes to get the job done. To do it right and safe sometimes takes longer, but GC's are willing to look the other way to get jobs done. We pride ourselves on a safe record and a standup company in a not so stand up division. We even try to say things when we see other trades being unsafe, only to be told to let it go. This is a long time coming for your "brief case" builders and GC who don't want to do anything but let jobs run themselves. It forces all who work these jobs to come together and follow safety guidelines. P.S. I'm not a fan of OSHA but I do understand they are just trying to do there job and make sure everyone goes home with what you brought. (fingers, toes, eyes etc...) P.P.S. See something, say something. You might be saving yourself or someone you know.