Federal agencies Rail Transportation

DeFazio: Final rule on railroad risk reduction programs fails to address fatigue

freight train
Photo: Leadinglights/iStockphoto

Washington — Effective April 20, the Federal Railway Administration is requiring the nation’s largest freight railroads – known as Class I – and smaller freight railroads with “inadequate safety performance” to develop and implement a formal risk reduction program. However, Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR), chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, says the final rule does not fulfill a congressional mandate to address rail worker fatigue.

A risk reduction program is a comprehensive, system-oriented safety approach that involves employees working together to identify potential hazards and determine plans to reduce or eliminate associated risks.

According to the final rule published in the Feb. 18 Federal Register, each railroad will have the flexibility to tailor the program to its own operations and must implement it with a written plan that FRA has reviewed and approved. FRA issued the rule in accordance to sections 103 and 109 of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008.

“Railroads’ ongoing evaluation of their asset base and employee performance associated with operations and maintenance, under FRA regulations, can now follow a more uniform path of standardization, toward further reducing risks and enhancing safety,” FRA Administrator Ronald Batory said in a Feb. 18 press release.

Sign up for Safety+Health's free monthly email newsletters and get the news that's important to you. Subscribe now

DeFazio disagrees. “The mandate from Congress in 2008 was crystal clear: FRA must require railroads to develop safety risk reduction programs that include fatigue management plans designed to reduce worker fatigue and reduce the likelihood of accidents, incidents, injuries and fatalities caused by the condition,” he said in a statement provided to Safety+Health on Feb. 24. “Yet, 12 years later, the agency’s final rule flies in the face of that mandate by failing to require that risk reduction programs address this major safety risk.

“For far too long, fatigue has plagued the industry, leaving railroad workers to suffer from exhaustion that can lead to unsafe situations that put workers and communities at risk.”

Other railroads not specifically identified in the rule also can submit risk reduction programs for FRA review, the agency states.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Mark Koenig
March 12, 2020
The entire schedule causes fatigue. Let's start with FRA Mandated rest. Sure, if our companies have us on duty for say maybe 14-16 hours due to not being relieved in a timely fashion, they are, "punished" by having to do without us for 14-16 hrs respectively. Take a closer look at that. I'm in the Chicago terminal zone, in a hotel for 14-16 hrs. Am I going to sleep more than 8? Probably not. So then I will be up for 8hrs before I, "Might" get a call to go on duty. Might be 18 or 20. Now after being awake for 8, 10 or 12 hrs I am supposed to be alert while on duty for 10-12hrs? Try that some time and make sure you are on duty for about 7hrs around 0300. No napping, it's not alowed...even when stopped. How about the first shift of the week? Available to work at 0500, maybe get a call somewhere around 1300-1400. So, been up for probably 6hrs and then called to work. 2he call before duty puts you at 1500-1700 on duty. A mere 10 hrs on duty is 0100-0300. How awake would you be? This starts the fatigue cycle on the very first work day. Trust me when I say that by day 5 or 6 it is much, much worse. These are just a couple of examples for you to ponder.

Title

Will
March 13, 2020
The biggest problem is not having scheduled starting times. Working on call I cannot remember how many times I was up all day then had to work all night then slept 8 hours in the hotel and then I was up for 20 hours before I got called to work when I wanted to go to bed.