Legislation Transportation Transportation

Support grows for reintroduced legislation aimed at curbing distracted driving

Stay alert
Photo: TexasPixelPro/iStockphoto

Washington — The American Trucking Associations is backing recently reintroduced bipartisan legislation intended to help states reduce distracted driving.

In a letter dated March 26 and addressed to leaders of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee and the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, ATA Vice President of Safety Policy Dan Horvath calls the Safe to Drive Act (S. 195 and H.R. 762) “a tremendous opportunity to focus greater resources and attention to accidents that our professional drivers cannot easily anticipate: those caused by distracted passenger motorists.”

Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), along with Reps. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Steve Cohen (D-TN), in February reintroduced the legislation, which would mandate the Department of Transportation allocate up to 25% of available grant funding toward national priority safety program grants to states that pass legislation banning driver use of mobile devices. Funds would be used to enforce such laws and for distracted driving education programs.

Data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration shows that in 2019, 3,142 fatalities occurred as a result of traffic incidents involving distracted driving. In the letter, Horvath cites additional NHTSA data showing this figure marked a 9.9% increase from the previous year.

“In commercial trucking, we require drivers to keep their eyes on the road ahead at all times – and we should expect the same vigilance of every motorist on the road,” he writes. “Sadly, convenient access to social media and streaming services has only increased the number of potential road hazards, leading to increases in the quantity and severity of distracted driving incidents.”

Sign up for Safety+Health's free monthly email newsletters and get the news that's important to you. Subscribe now

In an ATA press release, commercial motor vehicle driver Steve Fields voiced his dismay over the various distracted driving behaviors he has witnessed.

“I have seen everything from texting to putting makeup on, to even reading a newspaper while driving,” he said. “Taking your eyes off of the road for just two seconds compromises highway safety. Anything we can do to reduce distraction is a good thing.”

In a separate release, Klobuchar said the legislation “will help ensure states have the resources to create safer roads for all and, ultimately, save lives.”

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Tim Weir
June 1, 2021
While there is no doubt drivers are more distracted, it's not just the "4 wheelers" who are on their phones as this article suggests. I frequently observe over the road and local CDL operators on their phones while driving, and combined with frequent misuse of driver logs, operator fatigue for CDL drivers just adds to the problem. Mr. Horvath is quoted as stating "In commercial trucking we require drivers to keep their eyes on the road ahead at all times – and we should expect the same vigilance of every motorist on the road" With over 40 years in commercial, industrial and municipal safety, including fleet operations, this is certainly the goal, but his statement is not reality. The need for CDL drivers has drawn a less professional group of new truckers, who don't hold the experience, but drive as if they did. Mr. Fields quote on various distractions affirms my point, which is it's not just phones. Banning hands free/blue tooth operations is not the ultimate cure. According to his statement and Mr. Horvath non-truck drivers should have no passengers, no radios and operate without any type of distraction, and seem to suggest truckers (CDL operators) are actually doing that. Not true. I use my phone hands free regularly for short calls related to business. Any lengthy or technical conversations are reserved for non-driving time. This is not significantly different than CB use by over the road truckers and others with similar technology, which according to the logic of the article should also occur. Certainly texting, streaming movies and other similar phone operations are an issue and should be prohibited. The increase of "driver assist" technology is also a growing problem. Every "eye sight" or similar device, which takes away the driver's need to pay attention to the road and other drivers, is a serious road hazard. People are driving expecting their vehicles to keep them in their lane or slow them down when traffic speed changes, instead of paying attention to traffic flows and road positioning. The ATA should be looking for ways to increase driver's attention to the road, which includes stopping the proliferation of this dangerous trend. This article should more reflect the parity of poor driving habits from both CDL and non-CDL operators.