On the Safe Side podcast Episode 37: Pregnant Workers Fairness Act and loading dock safety
EDITOR’S NOTE: Each month, the Safety+Health editorial team discusses important safety topics, and interviews leading voices in the profession.
In Episode 37, the S+H team celebrates the third anniversary of the podcast by diving into the March issue’s feature story on the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. Additionally, Reginald Jackson, a safety and health specialist in OSHA’s Office of General Industry and Agricultural Enforcement, discusses loading dock safety in an expanded “5 Questions With …” interview.
Web links associated with this episode:
- “A look at the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act”: This feature story by Associate Editor Barry Bottino appears in the March issue of Safety+Health magazine.
- My Story: Safety pros share their journey into the EHS profession in this monthly feature. Email [email protected] to submit your safety origin story.
- “OSHA updates emphasis program on combustible dust”
- “OSHA emphasis program targets the auto parts supplier industry
- “Marty Walsh expected to step down as labor secretary to lead NHL players’ union: reports
- “MSHA: Miner deaths decrease overall, but machinery-related fatalities up
Don’t miss the next one: Sign up to be notified in an email about each new “On the Safe Side” podcast episode. |
Subscribe:
- Search your favorite podcast app for “On the Safe Side.” Please let us know if your podcast app doesn’t show a listing.
- Subscribe to the podcast using the RSS feed.
More ways to listen:
- The podcast’s media page on the Safety+Health website
- Apple Podcasts
- Google Podcasts
- Soundcloud
- Stitcher
- Spotify
- YouTube
- Amazon Music (Say "Alexa, play On the Safe Side podcast.")
- Audible
Catch up:
Listen to past episodes.
Post a comment to this article
Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)