Legislation Bus/limo/taxi Trucking Transportation

Bill would halt FMCSA’s movement on speed limiters

orange-semi
Photo: Missouri Department of Transportation Flickr

Washington — Legislation recently introduced in the House would prohibit the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration from requiring speed-limiting devices on large trucks and buses.

Sponsored by Rep. Josh Brecheen (R-OK), the Deregulating Restrictions on Interstate Vehicles and Eighteen-Wheelers, or DRIVE, Act (H.R. 3039) covers trucks, buses and multipurpose passenger vehicles weighing more than 26,000 pounds.

Brecheen is a fourth-generation rancher and former trucking company operator. “I know from experience driving a semi while hauling equipment, and years spent hauling livestock, that the flow of traffic set by state law is critical for safety instead of an arbitrary one-size-fits-all speed limit imposed by some bureaucrat sitting at his desk in Washington, D.C.,” he said in a press release.

In May 2022, FMCSA published an advance notice of supplemental proposed rulemaking that expands on a 2016 joint proposal from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and FMCSA that would require speed limiters. FMCSA is the lone agency listed on the proposal, which doesn’t specify a top speed. The 2016 proposal suggested capping speeds at 60, 65 or 68 mph.

The Department of Transportation’s Fall 2022 regulatory agenda lists June as a target date for publication of a second proposed rule.

Sign up for Safety+Health's free monthly email newsletters and get the news that's important to you. Subscribe now

Multiple industry groups back Breechen’s bill, including the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, the U.S. Cattlemen’s Association, and the Towing and Recovery Association of America. The American Trucking Associations, meanwhile, supports FMCSA’s proposal and recommends a recurring, five-year review of “speed-governing regulations” to ensure they remain consistent with current technology.

“These efforts to prohibit the development of safety policies are misguided,” Bill Sullivan, executive vice president of advocacy at ATA, said in a press release. “They will lead to more serious crashes – and this bill will never become law, even if it passes the House.”

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Name
May 17, 2023
To me being a Car driver it’s dangerous for these Trucks to be set at Lower Speeds, No One wants to be behind Slow moving Trucks, trying to pass each other, I seen with my own eyes, how agitated other drivers get, then caused Road Rage against Trucker, and Break Checking them, because they take too long to pass, 62 to 65mph is to damn Slow and dangerous, if you want to Limit the speed set it around 69mph to 72mph at least they, will have the speed to pass and move back over Safely, with out causing Backups and Congestion and Road Rage, got to use some Common Sense

Title

Deb Bailey
May 17, 2023
I see lots of comments on the set speeds that cause slow downs for trucks passing or going up inclines. I am more concerned about stopping distance and loads on these trucks. Force= mass x acceleration , Physics is still physics and getting hit from behind from a disctracted truck doing 80 mph with a maximum payload, well not much left to pick up after that collision. Additionally, the crash data is 10-13 years old, we have seen a major shift in truck drivers since covid. What does that crash data post covid with newer less experienced drivers look like?

Title

Tucker
May 17, 2023
Of course, no one from the agro culture division of trucking industry, or any of the owner operators would ever have a problem showing support for this bill. The bill has only over the road trucks being governored not anyone like cattle haulers. Just like cattle haulers still are not on eld logs. Flatbed, box haulers and refrigerator haulers still move the bulk of freight. We are the ones being forced to change and again because farmers and their families and friends are special.