Federal agencies Legislation Trucking Transportation

Speed-limiter proposal hot topic of House hearing

Robin Hutcheson
Photo: National Association of City Transportation Officials

Washington — Members of the House Highways and Transit Subcommittee veered from the focus of a recent hearing by challenging legislation that would require speed-limiting devices on heavy trucks.

During the Dec. 13 hearing on implementing provisions of the Infrastructure Investment and Job Act, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration head Robin Hutcheson fielded heavy questioning about the agency’s May 2022 advance notice of proposed rulemaking.

The ANPRM, however, isn’t part of the law.

“We share your commitment to drivers and certainly their safety and the safety of everybody who travels,” Hutcheson said in response to critical remarks on the ANPRM from Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO). “We are underway in a process of rulemaking; however, we have not yet issued any notice of proposed rulemaking.” 

Burlison interjected: “Well, I would encourage you to not implement that rule. I think you would have an outcry from [the trucking] community.”

The Department of Transportation’s Fall 2023 regulatory agenda lists December as a target date for publication of a second proposed rule.

In May 2022, FMCSA introduced an ANPRM that would mandate the installation of speed limiters on trucks, buses and multipurpose passenger vehicles weighing more than 26,000 pounds. The advance proposal expanded on a 2016 joint proposal from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and FMCSA. The latter is the lone agency listed on the ANPRM, which doesn’t suggest a top speed. The 2016 proposal specified capping speeds at 60, 65 or 68 mph.

FMCSA received nearly 16,000 comments on its updated advance proposal, which requested feedback from stakeholders on prompts including:

  • What percentage of the commercial motor vehicle fleet uses speed-limiting devices?
  • If in use, at what maximum speed are the devices generally set?
  • What training or skill sets are needed for motor carriers’ maintenance personnel to adjust or program electronic engine control units to set speed limits?

During the hearing, Rep. Troy Nehls (R-TX) advised Hutcheson to “listen to the truckers” who believe the measure regulates them too strictly. “I think they would know better than the bureaucrats and, specifically, Congress on this.”

Said Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-NJ): “Nobody’s asked for this. This is another creation of big government, in my opinion.”

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Jayrold Pollock
December 16, 2023
Rather than speed limiters why don't you try training new truck drivers with a trainer that has at least 10 years experience unlike what goes on now!!!! Typically the current experience level is 3 to 6 months. At that level experience the trainer does not have enough knowledge to pass on to the new driver that was put through school an not taught anything of what they need to know. Contact me if you want to know more of my 55 years experience, be glad to share to make highway safety a priority!!!!

Title

Mike watkins
December 16, 2023
Please drop this insanely idea immediately.. I’m sure by now you have driven on our major interstates. And I’m sure you have been behind two large trucks trying to pass on a section of two lane. It takes those truck forever to may the pass, why because there company has a mandated speed limiter installed in the truck. So those two trucks just take there time trying to pass each other, meanwhile the traffic behind them piles up, and become stagnant. So owner or later road rage from some aggressive driver takes hold, and guess what, and accidents are what evolves from this mandate. Don’t do it. A truck travel at 65-68 does the same amount of damage as a truck traveling at 70mph. It’s not a pretty picture at all. But mandated speed limiters just add problems not safety. Take a few hours out of your day and take a short trip on one of our interstates. You’ll soon see what I’m talking about. Thank you letting me reply. I’m currently retire from otr, trucking. I enjoyed my 25 year accident free career.

Title

Frank Becker
December 16, 2023
If ANYONE thinks there are problems with trucks being " in the way" now, you ain't seen anything yet. Road rage caused accidents will become the number one cause of deaths in the US in a short time after implementing this absurd regulation. Rules in general should be made by those with some sort of experience in the field. Driving a desk doesn't count.

Title

Allen B Krausse
December 28, 2023
Vehicles not traveling at the same speed or with the flow of traffic create congestion. Congestion creates situations where accidents occur. If that were not the case why do we have minimum speed limits on interstates. All one needs is to come up on someone not traveling with the flow and see how quickly unsafe conditions appear. Not sure anyone could even think having two speed limits on the same highway is intelligent. Lets get the picture. Semi doing the 68 speed limit and a small vehicle doing the speed limit 75 comes over hill. Accident set to happen. Even if it doesn't rear end the Semi the chain reaction of other vehicles adds to the chances of an accident are greatly enhanced. A slower semi being passed by another semi going up hill creates congestion today. It will only be compounded when two semis side by side going up a long incline 10 to 15 mph slower that traffic flow. ACCIDENT IN THE MAKING. Conclusion it is safer for traffic to flow at the same speed. Speed does not kill it is the sudden stops.