NSC Labor Division news Legislation Mining, oil and gas Mining_Oil_Gas

Two emergency medical techs is too many for small coal mines, Kentucky lawmaker says

Rep.-Bill-Wesley.jpg

Frankfort, KY — A bill that would reduce – to one from two – the number of mine emergency technicians required during each shift at small underground coal mines is advancing in the Kentucky Legislature.

METs are miners trained to provide emergency medical care and stabilize an injured worker’s condition.

Under the bill (H.B. 85), one MET would be required at mines with 15 or fewer workers, and two would be required per shift at underground mines with 15-51 miners. For each additional 50 miners on a shift, one more technician would be needed.

The legislation is sponsored by Rep. Bill Wesley (R-Ravenna), who claims the bill would help keep small mining operations going during a downturn in the industry.

“There have been coal mining shifts, or basically the whole coal production, shut down … because one MET did not show up for work,” Wesley said. “Nobody got paid. Everyone was sent home, and I think that this is a needed bill to help all the coal miners.”

Opponents, including Rep. Ashley Tackett-Laferty (D-Martin), counter that it would weaken safety in underground mines and provide minimal financial benefit to small mining companies.

“It truly troubles me to think that we could potentially be trading the safety of our coal mining families for what appears to be a nominal financial benefit, if anything at all,” Tackett-Laferty said on the House floor. “The safety practice of having an emergency medical technician onsite is not what’s causing these mines to close.”

H.B. 85 was approved by the Kentucky House with a 75-18 vote on March 11. It’s now under consideration by the Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Joseph sbaffoni
March 19, 2024
What if the one MET is the injured person? The bill takes away from safety at the mine. A mine should have as many trained MET’s as possible, so the requirements are always met. The safety of the miner should always be the priority!

Title

Larry Tipton
December 3, 2024
The safety of the miner should always be priority! But in some situations it is true that if one MET doesn’t make it to work then nobody gets to work! Some places are having to pay a MET that has no real experience and isn’t useful on the job to just be there and sit all day!! Another aspect is when doing reclamation (in which is mostly more dangerous than simple surface production) you are only required 1 Met and1 foreman on job which is usually same person and usually doing the main breaking down, which if injured leaves no met, so if 2 not required in reclamation then why on surface stripping?? No real good answers but rules need to be across the board and different situations can need different considerations! My opinion!