NSC Labor Division news Federal agencies Regulation Workplace exposures

OSHA withdraws infectious disease rule amid Trump administration’s regulatory review

OSHA logo

Washington — OSHA’s proposed rule on infectious diseases in “health care and other high-risk environments” is among the potential regulations listed as “withdrawn” on the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs website.

What that ultimately means for the proposed rule is unclear. An OSHA spokesperson told Safety+Health the agency had no comment.

The withdrawal likely stems from an Executive Order signed by President Donald Trump on Jan. 20. Among the EO’s provisions: “Immediately withdraw any rules that have been sent to the Office of the Federal Register but not published in the Federal Register, so that they can be reviewed and approved” by a department or agency head appointed or designated by the president.

The fate of the proposed rule may become more clear when the Trump administration publishes its first regulatory agenda, expected sometime in the next few months.

In a final rule published Jan. 15 that terminated its rulemaking on COVID-19 exposure in health care settings, OSHA said it was focusing its resources on the proposed rule on infectious diseases. That standard was expected to cover diseases such as tuberculosis, MRSA, influenza and COVID-19.

A corresponding press release announcing the decision now contains the note: “Information in some news releases may be out of date or not reflect current policies.”

Along with health care settings, the proposed rule was expected to apply to “other occupational settings where employees can be at increased risk of exposure to individuals who are potentially infectious.” Among them:

  • Emergency response
  • Correctional facilities
  • Homeless shelters
  • Drug treatment programs
  • Laboratories
  • Pathologists
  • Coroners’ offices
  • Medical examiners
  • Mortuaries

The proposed rule had been under OIRA review from Nov. 8 until Jan. 14.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Ursula Carr
January 26, 2025
Osha has a certain criteria to follow and now, the administration is trying to bypass this information, this is very crucial, if we could depend on anything it would be OSHA! There are standards ! Rules and regulations, we talking about safety hazards and human lives, food, cleaning products etc...I will continue to follow this closely

Title

Ursula Carr
January 26, 2025
I misread the proposal, Great job, I am very much familiar with OSHA regulations and I agree with extra precautions with blood borne pathogens, be exposed to infectious diseases, then have to go home to our families, I also believe we should get an enormous pay increase, because of the work we are affiliated with. I also think the PPE that's required for these positions should be issued from the employer or be tax free!

Title

Delois Ann Tucker
January 26, 2025
Anybody working in healthcare. And get covid or any other infectious disease and have to be out of work should get paid for it , You'll putting your health and life at risk.