Federal agencies

Dec. 1 enforcement deadline for recordkeeping anti-retaliation provisions remains on track

Anti-retaliation
Photo: Ridofranz/iStockphoto

Washington – A Dec. 1 deadline remains in effect for OSHA’s enforcement of anti-retaliation provisions in its injury and illness tracking rule, after the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas denied a motion that challenged the new provisions.

Eight industry groups, including the National Association of Manufacturers, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, and Associated Builders and Contractors, filed a lawsuit in July in an attempt to block the rule. According to the groups, the anti-retaliation provisions unlawfully ban or limit safety incentive programs and post-incident drug testing.

The court ruled against the motion Nov. 28.

The provisions, announced in May, initially were scheduled to go into effect Aug. 10, but OSHA delayed the enforcement date until Nov. 10 to allow time for additional outreach to the regulated community. The agency delayed the provisions a second time on Oct. 14 after the district court asked for extra time to weigh the motion.

The provisions require employers to inform workers about their rights to report work-related injuries and illnesses without the threat of retaliation. The agency states that employers’ reporting systems also “must be reasonable and not deter or discourage employees from reporting.”

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)