EMS workers face higher occupational injury rates, NIOSH says
Washington – Emergency medical services workers have higher rates of work-related injuries than the general workforce and three times the lost workday rate of all private-industry workers, according to a new fact sheet from NIOSH.
Using data gathered from a four-year study of EMS workers, the fact sheet states that more than 22,000 EMS workers are treated in emergency rooms for work-related injuries each year. Other findings:
- Full-time workers with less than 10 years of experience were injured most often.
- Injuries occurred most frequently while responding to 911 calls (including patient care and transport), and the primary ailments were sprains and strains to the neck and back.
- Actions that caused the most injuries were body motion – excessive physical effort, awkward posture or repetitive movement – and exposure to harmful substances (6,000 workers per year apiece), followed by slips, trips and falls (4,000); motor vehicle-related incidents (2,000); and violence/assaults (2,000).
To prevent workplace injuries and exposures, NIOSH recommends employers:
- Foster an environment of protection with policies and procedures supporting healthy eating, exercise and plenty of rest.
- Provide access to mental health services.
- Train workers on safe patient-handling procedures.
- Follow OSHA’s Bloodborne Pathogens Standard (1910.1030) and provide proper personal protective equipment.
- Promote the use of proper footwear to prevent slips, trips and falls.
- Improve motor vehicle safety with an emphasis on the use of restraints for workers and patients, vehicle safety checks, and emergency vehicle operating training.
- Provide risk management, de-escalation and self-defense training.
Post a comment to this article
Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)