Food Manufacturing

Lawmaker claims opponents of increased line speeds for poultry workers ‘jettison’ scientific data

poultry processing
Photo: Picsfive/iStockphoto

Washington – Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA) says lawmakers who cite concerns about worker safety when opposing his call to increase poultry-processing line speeds are willfully ignoring scientific data.

Collins specifically questions Democrats in an op-ed piece published Sept. 27 in The Hill.

In June, a group led by Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) sent a letter urging Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue to decline any proposal to increase line speeds, upholding action the Department of Agriculture took in a 2014 final rule. Collins sent his own letter to Perdue in May.

Under the rule, maximum line speeds remained capped at 140 birds per minute. Other plans proposed raising the top speed to 175 birds per minute, a move Collins said is feasible based on practices in poultry operations in Canada, Europe and Asia.

“Liberals appropriate the stories of individual poultry employees without disclosing that they don’t actually work in the lines in question here,” Collins writes. “They jettison a host of scientific data because it is inconvenient to their narrative of doom, gloom and righteous indignation.

“We serve our neighbors best when we allow evidence to mobilize our empathy. Scientific analysis demonstrates that innovation has simultaneously improved worker safety, product quality and operational efficiencies across the poultry industry, which means that they’re protecting and stewarding America’s most valuable resource – our workers.”

Collins points to improved technology in U.S. poultry plants that is built to foster worker safety, and cites a USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service pilot program established in 2007 for plants overseeing operations of up to 175 birds per minute. He also stresses that proposals would boost line speeds in first processing zones, which cover poultry inspections. The second processing zone, which operates separately and involves bone removal, would not be affected.

An April report from the National Employment Law Project uses Bureau of Labor Statistics data to show poultry workers are 1.6 times more likely to suffer work-related injuries and illnesses.

The Collins op-ed cites BLS data showing injury and illness rates in the poultry industry have fallen 81 percent since 1994.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Otto Rieck
October 9, 2017
Federal laws that set maximum operating rates on business is foolish and in direct opposition to the concepts of continual improvement both in operations and safety for workers. It's the same sort of lame demand that has made trade unions somewhat obsolete. It is the job of a manufacturer to produce as much as quickly as they can to sell to the consumer as cheaply as they can and make an acceptable profit. It is also the responsibility of the same corporation to ensure that their workers and can produce at that rate safely. Government regulation should be concerned only that the company does what they do safely. Innovation, whether in production, quality or safety, is encouraged by allowing innovation to provide better production, quality, and safety. When governments sets limits, as they do in this case, what incentive is there to invest in faster and safer operation methods that will cost more to develop and put into practice? If I can process 140 birds an hour safely and I am limited to that production why would I invest money in improvements? It is essential that we encourage continual improvement AND demand that safety be managed as part of that improvement. If we don't, we will find more and more of our food products with the made in China or Mexico label and what sort of quality and safety do we get from these places?