On Safety: A look at OSHA’s National Emphasis Program on COVID-19
Normally, before launching an NEP, OSHA would conduct 90 days of outreach. For this NEP, OSHA is waiving this requirement, as the agency determined that outreach and guidance was already provided over the past year. OSHA will, however, continue to provide outreach during the course of the NEP.
What OSHA will hold employers accountable for, surprisingly, is not directly spelled out in the directive. However, also on March 12, OSHA issued a revised enforcement guide that outlines what the agency will be pursing under the NEP.
Under this enforcement guide, OSHA will focus on:
- 29 CFR Part 1904 – Recording and Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illnesses
- 29 CFR 1910.132 – General Requirements – Personal Protective Equipment
- 29 CFR 1910.134 – Respiratory Protection
- 29 CFR 1910.141 – Sanitation
- 29 CFR 1910.1020 – Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records
- 29 CFR 1910.145 – Specification for Accident Prevention Signs and Tags
- 29 CFR 1910.1030 – Bloodborne Pathogens (OSHA has determined that this standard may offer a framework that may help control some sources of the virus, including exposure to body fluids.)
- Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 – the General Duty Clause
The General Duty Clause is a key element of this list. OSHA will, under the clause, expect employers to develop and implement an exposure (infection) control plan. Depending on the level of risk, the plan can be simple or expansive.
The first step in developing an ECP is to determine the level of risk, which will determine where an establishment stands in regard to the NEP. Refer to Appendices A and B of the NEP and determine if an establishment has been identified through the industry NAICS code as high risk by OSHA and therefore subject to potential inspection. If an industry group is covered in Appendices A and B, it should develop an ECP and examine its compliance with the standards listed above.
If an NAICS code isn’t included in Appendices A and B, that establishment could still be subject to inspection and an ECP should be considered. The scope of the ECP for a facility at lower risk can be less comprehensive than a high-risk facility, but the risk will need to be assessed to determine the scope of the ECP. Refer to the risk guidance document provided by OSHA.
Post a comment to this article
Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)