Federal agencies Mining, oil and gas Injury prevention Mining_Oil_Gas

Electronic vs. electric detonators: MSHA safety alert highlights the differences

detonator
Photo: Mine Safety and Health Administration

Arlington, VA — In an effort to dispel confusion between electronic and electric detonators, the Mine Safety and Health Administration has issued a safety alert.

Developed in conjunction with the Institute of Makers of Explosives, the alert notes that despite the similar appearances and functions of electronic and electric detonators, “they are very different.” Distinctions include:

  • Unlike electric detonators, the wire leads of electronic detonators don’t attach directly to a match head or bridge wire.
  • Electronic detonators feature additional protection from extraneous energy sources, such as a spark gap device to protect against static discharge events, as well as current limiting resistors.
  • Although both types of detonators are susceptible to damage by an electromagnetic pulse, electronic detonators typically have built-in protection from EMPs.
  • Whereas electric detonators can be used with any appropriate firing device, electronic detonating systems remain unique and must never be interchanged. Users should understand and follow manufacturer guidelines for training and overall use.
Sign up for Safety+Health's free monthly email newsletters and get the news that's important to you. Subscribe now

The alert instructs users to always clear blast areas of personnel, vehicles and equipment before connecting to the firing device or blast controller. Keep the blast area clear until the charge on an electronic detonator has had time to bleed off.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

BAMBAM
April 27, 2021
Working as a senior explosives safety professional for the USACE this article is very informative and I am very appreciative of the manner in which it was written for those who seldom get to see or use these. Thanks for a very well written general awareness safety article.

Title

M.O.SARATHY
October 8, 2021
No doubt, development of electronic detonator is the most significant one after Nonel by Dr. Per Anders Persson of Nitro Nobel AB, Sweden in 1967. There have been instances of premature firing of electronic detonators during programming, detonator firing out of sequence etc. The safety aspect viz immunity to extraneous electricity sources such as static, R-F energy, ground leakage currents etc. are still not fully enumerated. Needless to say, blast area needs to be vacated in the event of an approaching thunderstorm even with electronic detonators.

Title

Manish Sinha
March 31, 2022
Premature initiation of electronic detonators possibilities and causes required.