NSC Business and Industry Division news NSC Construction and Utilities Division news NSC Labor Division news Research/studies Worker health and wellness Worker Health and Wellness

How’s it going for companies trying 4-day workweeks?

four-week-calendar.jpg
Photo: Dragon Claws/iStockphoto

Cambridge, England — Nearly 90% of companies that participated in a four-day workweek pilot program have continued with that schedule a year later, a follow-up from research organization Autonomy has found.

Conducted by researchers from the University of Cambridge, the University of Salford and Boston College, the pilot comprised 61 organizations. Of them, 54 are still using the four-day workweek, and 31 have made the change permanent. 

All the managers and CEOs of the companies said the four-day workweek had a “positive” or “very positive” impact on their organizations. Around 82% reported positive effects on employee well-being, about half observed reduced employee turnover and 32% experienced improved recruitment.

A separate follow-up survey of employees from 47 of the companies one year later shows reductions in burnout, better work-life balance and greater life satisfaction.

“Interviews revealed the many positive initiatives and strategies that organizations have used to maintain their four-day week policies, including revising the norms around meetings, communications, work prioritization and more,” an Autonomy press release states. “Interviews also suggested that staff in organizations where the additional day off was only weakly guaranteed (or conditional on meeting certain targets) had some concerns about the policy.” The employees were able to use that extra time to focus on caring for family members and others, hobbies, or household chores.

“The one-year results are excellent,” Boston College sociology professor Julie Schor said in the release. “Overall results have held and, in some cases, have even continued to improve. Physical and mental health and work-life balance are significantly better than at six months. Burnout and life satisfaction improvements held steady. Job satisfaction and sleep problems nudged down a bit, but the bulk of the original improvement remains.

“The key point is that the strong findings at six months are not due to novelty or short-term impacts. These effects are real and long-lasting.”

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

William Buckman
March 13, 2024
I find it incredible that the researchers can find this program a success and long-lasting when there is only ONE year of data. How does this 4-day work week work with industry overall or is this planned focus of work sites specifically chosen for their compliance and fit to the outcome. There was no mention of the type of industry or work environments. Maybe the entire raw data and how it was calculated should be shared with the world to determine its validity.

Title

Mark Marston
March 13, 2024
Interesting read. Maybe you should consider a 5 day work week.

Title

Angela
March 15, 2024
Our company has had four day work weeks for awhile and it's great. Our company is small adhesive manufacturer in the the US Midwest. Our hourly employees work 4 10 hour days with Friday off; our salary employees still work a 5 day week but have great flexibility in their hours. Our employees have nothing but positive reviews for the 4 day week (even though it means they are at work by 6 am). Our business is doing very well with production and shipping hitting all their deadlines. Turnover is very low and morale is high with an eNPS of 8.2/10.

Title

William Forsythe
March 15, 2024
The article does not mention the names of the 61 organizations involved or the industries they represent. It is unclear whether these companies are offering a three-day weekend or a mid-week day off. How can the companies measure the real and lasting effects if the study only covers one year? The Autonomy press release lacks information on the financial impact on production, quality, or shareholder value. Without comprehensive measurement of all factors, the article appears ambiguous and more like an opinion piece rather than a trustworthy source.

Title

Bob P.
March 15, 2024
How about some balance here - this article tells us all about the observations that can be interpreted as positive for the organizations, but were there not any negatives as well? (I can't believe there weren't). As a professional publication the article needs to be giving us the full picture to help us make choices, not be a marketing piece advocating for one particular vision of how work should be organized.