Fatigue Health care/social assistance Health Care Workers

Proposal to lengthen shifts for first-year medical residents gains support

medical student

Photo: Wavebreakmedia/iStockphoto

Philadelphia – The American College of Physicians has voiced its support for a proposal that would allow first-year medical residents to work shifts of up to 28 hours without sleep.

The announcement, made Dec. 19, came about six weeks after the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education proposed several revisions to its medical residency and fellowship program standards.

Since 2011, ACGME has capped shifts for first-year residents at 16 hours of consecutive time; other residents may work up to 28 hours without sleep. ACGME’s proposal would allow all residents to work up to 24 consecutive hours plus four hours to manage transitions in care.

Dr. Nitin S. Damle, ACP president, said in a statement that removing the 16-hour limit would streamline the learning process for residents.

“By mandating different hours for [first-year residents] and more senior residents, the old standard disrupted the continuity of the resident team and resulted in considerable unintended consequences without commensurate improvement in patient safety or educational outcomes,” Damle said in the statement.

Not everyone embraces the proposal. In September, watchdog group Public Citizen published results from a poll in which 86 percent of 500 respondents said they likely would feel anxious upon learning a doctor treating them had been on duty for more than 16 hours without sleeping. The same poll revealed that 77 percent of respondents believe hospital patients should be informed if a resident treating them has been working for more than 16 hours without sleep.

An ACGME task force will review comments from ACP and other groups. The task force is scheduled to send final proposed requirements to the ACGME board of directors for review in February.

Post a comment to this article

Safety+Health welcomes comments that promote respectful dialogue. Please stay on topic. Comments that contain personal attacks, profanity or abusive language – or those aggressively promoting products or services – will be removed. We reserve the right to determine which comments violate our comment policy. (Anonymous comments are welcome; merely skip the “name” field in the comment box. An email address is required but will not be included with your comment.)

Title

Name
January 6, 2017
Would we allow construction workers, police, fire, or other jobs where good judgement is critical to a "safe" outcome to operate without proper rest? Never!!! So why on earth do we allow people/doctors-to-be with minimal training, make life and death decisions without, what we know for a fact, is not sufficient rest/sleep to make these critical decisions. Absolutely ridiculous!!! The people making this decision are brain-deficient.

Title

Name
February 21, 2017
This is pretty much reflective of the old physicians saying: we did it, so you have to do it too. However older physicians did not have to deal with the level of complexity we deal with now, or with health insurance issues or the mountain of paperwork. Residenrs are drained financially (now with most having 6 figure loan amounts, which the older generation not having as well), emotionally, and physically. Pretty much, I've realized that resident physicians are expected to do the work of ancillary staff with lower pay, worse hours, and no real representation by the acgme that couldn't care less about resident well being. It's absolutely ridiculous. Certain programs that are malignant are allowed to stay open on these "probationary periods" without anything changing. This is abuse, plain and simple, and needs to stop.